By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Security Parrot - Cyber Security News, Insights and ReviewsSecurity Parrot - Cyber Security News, Insights and Reviews
Notification
Latest News
OpenAI may use Associated Press archive for AI training
July 14, 2023
EU users can hold conversations with Google Bard from training set
July 14, 2023
Aptos, the new default font for Microsoft Office
July 14, 2023
BlackLotus UEFI bootkit sources published on GitHub
July 14, 2023
Hackers from the XDSpy cyber-espionage group attacked Russian organizations on behalf of the Ministry of Emergency Situations
July 14, 2023
Aa
  • News
  • Tutorials
  • Security InsiderComing Soon
  • Expert InsightComing Soon
Reading: Police task force does not want Meta to introduce end-to-end encryption
Share
Security Parrot - Cyber Security News, Insights and ReviewsSecurity Parrot - Cyber Security News, Insights and Reviews
Aa
Search
  • News
  • Tutorials
  • Security InsiderComing Soon
  • Expert InsightComing Soon
Follow US
Security Parrot - Cyber Security News, Insights and Reviews > News > Police task force does not want Meta to introduce end-to-end encryption
News

Police task force does not want Meta to introduce end-to-end encryption

Last updated: 2023/04/21 at 1:04 PM
Security Parrot Editorial Team Published April 21, 2023
Share
SHARE

The Virtual Global Taskforce (VGT), an international cooperation of police units, has called on tech giant Meta to abandon end-to-end encryption on Facebook Messenger and Instagram. The VGT, which was founded in 2003 and consists of 15 members, including the Dutch police and Europol, argues that this would make the protection of children more difficult. As an example, the organization cites the case of Englishman David Wilson, who urged thousands of children through Facebook to take sexual photos and videos for him. With end-to-end encryption, it would have been unlikely that he would have been caught, the VGT says.
Meta disagrees with this statement, however. A spokesperson for the tech giant told The Register that it already has detection systems in place to detect bad actors. “We don’t think people want us to read their private messages. That’s why we’ve put in place security measures that can prevent and detect this type of despicable abuse. This way we can take action against it, while keeping online privacy and security of paramount importance.”
Currently, Meta’s well-known messaging service WhatsApp contains this form of privacy protection. End-to-end encryption ensures that no one except the sender and receiver can view messages. Implementing this on Facebook Messenger and Instagram would simply follow Meta’s existing service.

Weekly Updates For Our Loyal Readers!

Security Parrot Editorial Team April 21, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020

You Might Also Like

News

OpenAI may use Associated Press archive for AI training

July 14, 2023
News

EU users can hold conversations with Google Bard from training set

July 14, 2023
News

Aptos, the new default font for Microsoft Office

July 14, 2023
News

BlackLotus UEFI bootkit sources published on GitHub

July 14, 2023

© 2022 Parrot Media Network. All Rights Reserved.

  • Home
  • Parrot Media Group
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?